logo tvt messed up mesh tvt mumtvt mum petition

The Voices Today on Messed up Mesh (TVT Mum)
Help and support to both men and woman who have had the medical device TVT Retropubic, TVT-Secur, TVTO and TOT, synthetic polypropylene mesh for hernias, prolapse, stress incontinence and bladder and bowel disorders. You're not alone!

British Medical Journal

Dated 29 May 2011

british medical journal





Thousands of people face painful and expensive surgery to remove failing medical devices such as metal hip replacements and cardiovascular implants, according to investigations by the BMJ and Channel 4 Dispatches. Please view here for more information: dispatches-the-truth-about-going-under-the-knife.html

From our Medical Expert Advisor:
The problems with vaginal meshes is just as serious as the hip and cardiac devices but it has not received the same publicity. The MHRA has been severely criticised for doing very little and the commercial activities of the companies involved have been a disgrace.

The BMJ (British Medical Journal) is an international peer reviewed medical journal and a fully “online first” publication. Please find following some of the concerns raised on the BMJ website as below:-

In 1993 a BMJ editorial warned of the “fashion trade” in joint replacements (BMJ 1993;306:732). It said this was costing health services many millions of pounds each year and causing patients pain and distress through early failure of unproved implants. This week an investigation by the BMJ and Channel 4 Dispatches shows how right this view was and how little has changed.
Full PDF: The-trouble-with-medical-devices.pdf >>>

The UK regulator, the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), has concerns about the current system, saying that “the evidence on safety and efficacy of new devices and new procedures at the time they are introduced into UK practice is very variable.” It has also suggested that the evidence base for most devices was poor.
Full PDF: Europeans-are-left-to-their-own-devices.pdf >>>

Competing interests have an unhealthy influence on drug prescription. Drug companies publish selective data aided by clinical researchers, who accept payment to be gift authors of ghost written articles.4 Universities that receive research funding from industry can turn a blind eye to misreporting of research.
Full PDF: The-regulation-of-medical-devices.pdf >>>

Also read this article I found in the Guardian Newspaper:
How drug companies' PR tactics skew the presentation of medical research
Elliot Ross reveals the secret 'army of hidden scribes' paid by the drug companies to influence doctors
Source: www.guardian.co.uk/science/2011/may/20/drug-companies-ghost-writing-journalism >>>

Ideally, collection of clinical data should be an integral part of healthcare systems. Without systematic collection of individual patient data and outcome it is impossible for individual doctors, healthcare providers, or regulatory agencies to understand how, when, and to whom healthcare is provided and the actual outcome of specific procedures or devices. Furthermore, complications of new devices or strategies, particularly those that are unexpected or infrequent, may be impossible to identify without systematic data collection in a registry.
Full PDF: Use-of-registries-to-investigate-the-past.pdf >>>

There are many kinds of medical devices for myriad purposes in healthcare. All require an adequate regulatory framework to ensure that patients gain clear benefits and are not placed at unreasonable and avoidable risk.
Full PDF: Evaluating-and-regulating-device-therapy.pdf >>>

It is one of the biggest disasters in orthopaedic history, according to one senior surgeon. On 24 August 2010, DePuy, a subsidiary of American giant Johnson and Johnson, recalled its ASR (articular surface replacement) hip prostheses from the market. The recall followed years of denial by the company that the ASR implants had caused pain and disability in patients. In a statement to the BMJ, DePuy claim that “given the available information, we believe we made the appropriate decision to recall at the appropriate time.”
Full PDF: Out-of-joint-The-story-of-the-ASR.pdf >>>

No implantable medical device is perfectly safe. It is the duty of manufacturers and regulators to minimise risks—and the purpose of evaluating and regulating devices is to ensure safety and effectiveness.
Full PDF: International-collaboration.pdf >>>

Medical device regulation is currently being questioned in both Europe and the United States.1 Although both systems are under review, that’s where the similarity ends. Both the approval process and policies on access to data are very different. And our research, published this week in BMJ Open and part of a wider series of investigations in which the BMJ has been involved, shows how difficult it makes it to find out about recalled devices in the UK.2
Ful PDF: Medical-device-recalls-and-transparency-in-the-UK.pdf >>>

Problems with hip resurfacing that were initially reported included raised blood cobalt and chromium ions,4 loosening of components,5 hip fracture,6 and soft tissue reactions around the hip
Full PDF: Metal-on-metal-hips.pdf >>>

Regulatory bodies are expected to protect the public from the danger of inappropriately tested treatments—a shield against the vested interest of drug and device companies to sell products irrespective of their safety and effectiveness. The idea of the greedy industrialist focused on short term advantage and endangering lives with low quality components used to save manufacturing costs is familiar to the public and seems to justify stringent regulatory processes. But one person is forgotten in this equation—the doctor.
Full PDF: The-risk-of-over-regulation.pdf >>>

Your feature edition (Published 18 May 2011) has certainly highlighted the problems of the regulation of medical devices, particularly in Europe. Attempts to draw parallels between drug regulation and that of medical devices however can only be taken so far.
FUll PDF: In-response-to-the-Editor.pdf >>>

You will see and hear from people who decided not to go ahead with surgery after reading our website. They have been saved from harm!

For more information on our petition please visit here www.tvt-messed-up-mesh.org.uk/petitions.html >>>




Navigation links within the TVT Mum website

Hidden Disability Chronic TVT/Mesh Implant Inflammation |
Articles, Urology/Urogynaecology Conferences and Research from around the World |
Articles and Letters by TVT Mum

British Medical Journal | Dispatches Channel 4 Documentary 'The truth about going under the knife'

Advice and Help Guide on TVT, TVT-Secur,TVT-O and TOT Tape/Mesh Medical Devices | Alernative Treatments for Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI) and Prolapse (POP) | Men's Health | Mesh Related Complications | Mesh Unexplained Symptoms | Mesh Surgery Experiences | Mesh Removal Stories | Synthetic Mesh Other Nasty Products | TVT, TVT-Secur, TVT-O and TOT, Medical Devices | TransObturator Tape (TvT-O and TOT) Medical Devices | TVT Medical Terminology

Medicine and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) | Worldwide Medical Device Incident Reporting
TVT Mum Volunteers | The History of TVT MUM| Latest News |
Frequently Asked Questions | Press and Media | Testimonials |
Privacy and Data Protection | Terms and Conditions | Website Map | Links

Tweets by @TVTMum
Follows us on

Twitter






Location: Stoke Gifford, Bristol, United Kingdom

disclaimer

copyright notice

Website Design by Lorraine Evans at TVT Messed up Mesh

Back to top of Page